Now Playing Tracks

queernatural:

Petition for Dean to meet a bisexual character who kisses a guy and a girl in the same episode and Dean will be all like “Wait I thought you were hetero” and they’ll be all, “Nah man, I swing both ways” and Dean will be like “Wait, that’s a thing?” and the person will be like, “Duh, I’m bisexual”

and then Dean’s face will be exactly this

image

bonus points if Charlie is in the same episode

cecilbaldwinfan:

I try not to speak for Cecil, because I don’t personally know him and he has his own voice. 

But I want to emphasize a couple of things here.

Cecil reads Tumblr. 

Audre Lorde was a queer person of color. 

This is the closest Cecil can come to actually getting involved and saying “care about queer people of color in the fandom”. 

Please think about what this means. 

jacquid3:

“Feminism is worthless without intersectionality and inclusion” I remember quoting this in my Sociology seminar and a white girl got really offended and upset smh till this day I still dont get what that was all about lol. Feminsim shouldnt just look at the white middle class heterosexual experience it should look to be inclusive of women of all races, religions, sexuality and socio-economic backgrounds. Since patriachy isnt a white girl problem its ALL GIRLS/WOMENs problem and therefore it should be SOCIETY’s problem. And we need to understand a woman’s race, religion, class, and or sexuality effects their experiences of patriachy.

stopholdingontoair:

It’s weird to think about how your birth is a fixed point in time but your death is constantly moving based on the decisions you make. The length of your life is always fluctuating.

It’s funny how seemingly insignificant things , such as day-to-day desicions, in your life can suddenly change how you look at things and all that is needed is change of perspective or experience.

gateship:

acquaintedwithrask:

mmkayn:

vastderp:

lalaland1212:

theatre-whovian:

vastderp:

Meet the Mona Lisa of the Prado, the earliest known copy of Da Vinci’s best portrait. Similarity in the undersketch of the painting indicates that this was very likely painted concurrently with the original Mona Lisa, by a student of Da Vinci.

There is much controversy in the art world over the question of whether or not to clean the fragile Mona Lisa, but her sister has been restored and some fairly odd later alterations removed to show the original vibrant colors and lighting. Some details, such as the sheerness of her shawl and the pattern on the neckline of her dress, have become utterly obscured in the original, but in the restored copy they’re perfectly clear.

It blows my mind a little bit to look at these two sisters side-by-side and imagine how much vivid detail could be hiding in the Mona Lisa under 500 years of rotten varnish. 

THE COPY HAS EYEBROWS

Your response to a beautiful piece of artwork done by Leonardo Da Vinci himself is “SHES GOT EYEBROWS”. Alright. All intelligent life has been lost.

Yo Snooty McSnotwhine, the Mona Lisa’s vanished eyebrows have been the subject of debate and analysis in the art expert community for hundreds of years, long before your parents squirted water at each other from across the clown car and then honked their bicycle horns to indicate they really wanted to make a smug, insufferable little clown baby together. 

this continues to be the best reply to a criticizing comment on this site

the main post is always relevant to my interests but that reply is by far the most singularly scathing, beautifully crafted insult i have ever seen in my entire life.  it is a work of art unto its own and I admire it greatly

Is no one going t o mention how sassy she looks in the restored painting?

(Source: that-darned-sock)

To Tumblr, Love Pixel Union